A FACSIMILE REPRODUCTION
WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION AND
AN INTRODUCTORY ESSAY
ON ANATOMICAL STUDIES IN
TUDOR ENGLAND
BY
C. D. O’MALLEY
AND
K. F. RUSSELL
STANFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
Stanford, California
1961
English translation and Introduction
© C. D. O’Malley and K. F. Russell, 1961
PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN
AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, OXFORD
BY VIVIAN RIDLER
PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY
TO THE MEMORY OF
CHARLES SINGER
FRIEND AND MENTOR
Grateful acknowledgements are made forassistance from the National Science Foundation in thepreparation of this work; to the British Museum forpermission to photograph the only copy of DavidEdwardes’s Introduction known to be in existence; andto the Wellcome Trust whose help made the publicationof this work possible.
On 22 August 1485 the battle of Bosworth providedits victor with the throne of England. Richard IIIdied sword in hand and was unceremoniouslyburied in the Grey Friars at Leicester, and on that sameday the victor, Henry Tudor, was as simply crowned andacclaimed by his troops as Henry VII. So began the Tudordynasty in England which was to last until the death ofElizabeth in 1603, to be one of the most colourful periodsof English history and to witness the arrival of the Renaissancein England. Later than its manifestation on theContinent, but thereby reaping the benefits of continentaldevelopments, English humanism as a result was soon tobecome no mean rival. The development of English literatureis too well known for comment, while classical studies,and especially those in Greek, were to rival their continentalcounterpart by the end of the first quarter of the sixteenthcentury. Science, however, and more particularlymedicine, were laggards.
In those closing years of the fifteenth century whichushered in the new Tudor monarchy the art of healingderived from two sources, the universities of Oxford andCambridge and the organizations of barbers and surgeons.At Oxford medical teaching was organized by the fifteenthcentury, and medicine constituted one of the four facultiesof the university together with theology, law, and arts. Yetat Oxford, as at Cambridge, the medical curriculum waslong to remain medieval.[1] Both schools had taken theirmodel from Paris, but whereas Parisian medicine had2begun to stir and advance in the fifteenth century, theEnglish universities remained somnolent. At Cambridgethe degree of Doctor of Medicine required altogethertwelve years of study based upon lectures and discussionsdrawn from medieval sources. While it is true that twoyears of this time were to be spent in the practice of medicine—seeminglya borrowing